5 219
be practice I find prevailing here, this recommendation of Bemagistrate, under Ordinance 4/877/1955 techoy XXI ve property accompanied, when sich around the members
members of
the
Council of the Governor, by depositions alleged against the prisoner
the various cales
as the justification for the order of Deportation.
5 The Magistrate's recommendations & the depositions
cause the in
the renal course on the 19th of May, each member of Council having rea papers his concurrence with
recorded upon
Mr. May's recommendations
6.
th
5. Looking to the heavy penalty
of five years' banishment, &
involved in
of the still severer penalties
unlawful reasons
From
Av
Government Ho
Victoria, Hong
from deportation (a
ancorumay crime air
Bong.
Lady
crime in Hongkong?
I have felt is the
my duty
not to lifes deportation orders
hastily But not
of course;
carefully consider the depositions & the proceedings
of
of the magistrates in each case. Having done
7.
make the
this in
done th
op Exxan-tin-ham,
the following arminte
or
the papers on the 22nd of May
I signed the
deportation warrant with
reluctance, as one
of the
sentences that had been
carried into effect appeared
The illegal. In this
be
I am also somewhat surprised