345
should have fixed on Feungafut
more
other person as the secored
than on
any robber. Two other men.
identify him with equal clearness. All three witnesses
must be perjured if he was not a
partaker in the
in the robbery.
The contrary
is set up by the first prisoner I can attack no weight to what
he
says.
Leung a full himself says before
Mr. May that he was at the time of the robbery at a different part of the ...
Harbour but on this he is not.
corroborated.
He himself gives two versions
of the circumstances under which he
was
arrested on the morning.
was
after the robbery on the premises where some of the Opium. found.
When before the committing
Magistrate he reserved his defence - In
the Supreme Court after stating that at the time of the robbery
he
was in
a
different part of the harbour at the time of the robbery he said that on the following morning he had gone to the matshed of the third prisoner and was on his return on the hill from it when the Chinese Constable met him asked him to go back to the matshed and then arrested him. a charge of serious misconduct then set up for the only time. In his statement made before Mr. May Ho.