out £250 15 the sum provided in the last #therefore it is a burden of Mr Austin to talk of any half salary being an objection
I have never been quite satisfied that it was a good arrangement to combine the Two offices, but I do not see that Mr. Austin makes out sufficient reason for
his allowance
Increasing
such it was
a very lucky arrangement for him
JAR
19/3/72
Ball Whether it was a good
arrangement
the question.
not does it affect
A nor
examination &c are
done after
due.
matter of story
M
I would negative
clause stating what ought to
have been made
de
in my opinion
this
not there
Lee
draft & deficit &c. left; p−.
mit.
Arctis M. Austin has been
for the sum of £250 for more than year
originally
C
112
intended
(19.07
An untenable claim 179 de re furing
Remind him
Mr Jozi
mi
the fort
but intentions.
RM 23/3
Dust storm
contained