and in
England; but it must be recollected that the Chief Justices has always held very strong
everything that could be – possibly associated with gambling of
views
I which he has the most perfect-
abhorrence.
11.
The objection that Mr Wheung Thring states "the legislative result of the late financial panic"
does not seem to be
of much value, because Mr Mean
from this that
weepily
Thring may the panic showed the necessity of this Act. I don't see that he
says
12.
a single word
against it.
And what is more important
Mr Henry Thring says
327
that same
Companies which had fallen into
the
error
of making their shares
too large and not easily marketable applied Committee of the
convinced a
House of Commons of the necessity
of giving
them relief, and the section for reduction of capital and
shares
were made law. The above
points out that there is possible precaution taken the account of creditors should not be diminished see
page 7. In reference to the objection
13.
to share warrant payable to bearer Mr Henry Thring simply remarks that "these exceptions exist.