held that under the Frenty with Ameriin which specifies "Princy"
as
one of the Extractition
Creines,
a
man cannot
be surrendered
for
Pirncy jure gentium"
but only for
Crime which
is
made pericy by the Municipal Law.
of the Country den
- munding the surrender
of the
accused because
there is "Concurrent
"Lurisdiction.
in
cases of Princy pure
gentium.
In
2. 13. The case of the Spark is stated
to have occurred in Chinese Waters though is a British Shijo. Hence the concurrent Jurisdiction - of that be so, the crime not having occurred on the high seas, the Prisoners could not have been tried for Piracy "jure gentium" in Hongkong but only for Robbery & Mander in British Ship.gp.
85
In the case
of the Attorney
of Hong Kong
Geneent
Kwok. a-sing before
the Privy Council- this view was
upheld,
notwithstanding
the extreme generality..
of the words of the
Tientsin.
Fenty of
The Privy Council.
Judgment states
pant all ordinary
crimes such as
()
munder, robbery, theft,
arson, committed
by ca.
in Chinese within Chinise Tirritong
Page 90Page 91