& Mr. Alabaster was intended as A censure of the conduct of the w latter gentleman.
Is deal with the last question first I can assure & 2. hat in the w -uggestion that in any matter, in hote:
the Colony might see reason
The Gook of
Complane
the act as
the
Or
& Comment upon smission of a Jense
:Officer this regation tht be be the first misdance appealed & - Twas actuated by rothening but a desire I prevent misunderstanduigo Two crvices th: have but a common
between
interest & duty. Foud be by
Fond be by fremely
concerned if any
remark of mine
rad appeared in any way to reflect
able Subordinate
litter upon J. E. or for very
As regards the question of promistuen so immigration. I may have been to Hame for looking raîtier
The
particular hinstance th: Occasioned the correspole witte der slabaster, than.
#
the larger difficulty in 20h: absence of
Control over the arrival
obrogiems
Chinese might place the Colony. I 142 accepted "W. Alabasters explanations
BCE/72 of that had occurred in Oct Satisfactory, & thinking the case
Fil
very unlikely a recur. G. 9. Caracterize the proceeding
as "umprecedented". I
must admit that I dismissed it Is repair my error heurid
From Key
but I have how written in der hedhurst A dep: A Copy Of bh; I beg to lillese, & I am mistructing
&. dr. Forels at
a
ale the ports, to far as in them his, is act in the spirit of my his Nuctions & M. Medhurst.
If, as diver understand the Cerrexpr I. Es Goot is stile apprehensive that the Colony may be inconvenienced by the importation unchecked of objectionable Chinese, I confers that I see no defence aganist such an liit except in the ports of the Colony itself. were the ports of Chirice open to British Grade or frequented exclusively by British
alone.