1
ones.
The question remains. Is the claim of the Plaintiff for wages, and damages for wrongful dismissal a good
The Plaintiff is an Americans subject and has for many years.
board
worked as a seaman on
American ships, and must be taken to be well aware of American law on the subject of wages, and of the marmer in which disputes settled, although he says he was not.__. He went before the Acting Consul for his certificate of discharge
are
as he was bound to do-Ordinance 6 of 1852 section 5. The question of
extran
: wages was raised before the Acting Consul, and decided without
474
any protest on his part, or rather raised by the Plaintiff himself -
He says "Dasked if any arrangement had been made about 2 months pay, and was told I did not require it." After considering all that took place I am of opinion that he acquieseed in the view of the tribunal selected and therefore must be bound by the decision about the 2 months wages which were due to him. Had he not been paid the wages earned as Mr. Demys points out the account to be rendered of wages and deductions by Ordinance b of 1852 section 2 is a matter independent of the discharge. and I am of opinion that any-