کچھ
describes distinctly in Section 441
haw Oler
Majesty's
· Cohina and Japan
execute
any
Canto in
are to
Warrant
issuing
from the Inpreme Cant of Charging from which Section it may be inferred that ther Majesty's Courts in China and Japan have no other anchority to act upor Warrants
or
conformity
requests except in
with that section.
In
You
despatch you
state
should
you
that "it is desirable
"know whether Telegrams will
h
as
effectual at Shanghai
elsewhere", but neither
"be
Wo
Mov
the Attorney
me in what
arrest
557
General inform
way telegrams
to
perons are elsewhere
as I know,
effective. As far arronts by telegrams
are made!
in
England
the personal
responsibility of the officers effecting them, and are not the acts of the Counts of justice.
The suspicion which
office
justify
an...
may
in arresting
an individual for committed - if reaso
a Orime
smable
may
exonerate him from the consequences of his act; but
I do not see hav
a
request
you
from
an
Officer who keeps his