for the Governor of Hongkong's
which appeared to you
opuiion (1754) the
food mas
5. The Governor of Harishong however has been requested in Lord Kimberley, despatch 3000 9 March to state precisely what
the grounds for his opinion, and I thaile it
might be suggested to the 70. that the statement in the zero. : posed reply to the French Muister should he qualified
Nr 24/4
}
301
and by adding a concluding paragraph.
the statement contained
par of
7.0.
in the third
the Daftar verived from the may prove
Ma
not to be in accordance
interpretation 7
it may also
taller the law.
dicated.
further consideration
with
the Existity
the strict
laws and
be found inexpedient
Keun
in the auction in-
of 25
Japusculls 25/2/93
I won
would
to cure out du
last sugguted for apple
گا
in pencil think Jurmine
wet but
re
-
eveni certum
h
replying.
I would toudt to
2
copy
2
کے
the despatch adduped to Sir t Menned
me
the statutory Distances (in 1754) on the best of the statutory distance
L
of Sargon
say that
A
Shanghal from Hong Kong, and
his reply must be
before any definite
verived
Lew's con
can be
woord at it would seem expedrent
Igualify the draft by altering the 3'
!
par
Ka
है
sufferted (you in pencil/
to the beach for unless they
pupas perethe
not perant
if
This will
considering
it neeeping - K 26
7