a

the Hong Kong foot, expplemented by Pension from Honduras, be deemed quite adequate in reference to the cired of his

there is no call for compelling

Case

the Hong-Kong fort to pay more thaw

the amount it has named.

Mr Ball's Honduras service was

Jo.

6.7.

d. 13

But from this I think it would

be proper to deduct half of the time during which he was absent on leave on 1⁄2 Salany (1st 2 mo: 14 d.) o

4

7.7

This would leave, for for purposes V. 6.0.6

His Hong-Kong bervice is, net, 10.

Total Service

8.0

9 16.86

Of his pension is to be computed

on the Intercolonial Scheme, the case

will stand thus: -

viny

Honduras in

Car Cocapto

addition for

₤1500

oy

200

MINUTE PAPER. (Continued)

₤825 per annum.

This

Of this there would be assignable to B. Honduras & of his Honduras Pal? of Esto

or £50 pecannum would throw £975 on Hong-Kong, instead of £ 625 - the amount propord by the Colonial for? –

Of the 2 pensions be treated

as distinct, the Honduras pension

would be as above,

£50

as above, ₤50

ofessional quely " The Hong-Kong pension W. be:

10 years

Service Abolition addition 5

Addr. Zer offeinz

As About

10

25.

#+

a year

Z**

Actual servici

16

Add for abolition &

x. Not in Hong. Ke

2.

23.

Addition assigned by Hong-Kong Pension Ministe

to the Office held by Mr Ball

(on 16 Jears' servia)

10.

33 Jears Kong Malary of

minate, bust printe

admitted in Rennie's Cras applied by

in the present on

In

i:e:

60

25 of £100 or £625 a year

Total £675

£825

as againal

Calculated on the combined service.

There is a

distinct question

Share This Page