6.

that

m

21

may

here be stated

the 26th Augent after the

gone through,

Estimates had been

item by item, by

with the

the leamail

very fullut explanations,

not a single alteration

-proposed by any

Member of

lemmal. Punter, that after the

last item had been considered?

and before the report

I stated

time

was

agam

Member to

was made,

that

if funtier

required by any

the Vote

W..

envida

-arry

any

of

reasmable

ground, I would second the

motion for adjournment.

No

Member, however, expressed a

wish for delay,

Was

504

and the Ordinance

pased.

From the above it will

be observed that Mr. Rippie's

Protest does not contain an

accurate statement of fact.

The d. (1). Mefr. Ravitt & Whittall centioristim acceded to the advisability of the

Bad Reading of

Reading of the Ordinance

Offre

tatting place at the time fiseed. (11). No motion for the 2nd Reading

waz

it

put to the Cemal on the

19th August _ the Gremor merely

adjourning the leamail for

one

"of wate, when the 2nd Reading

ordered to take place (111). When the 2.00 Reading of

wa

nd

Share This Page