CO129-155 - Others - 1871

B F

Me dizel

Norweil 111 Maw

I Costany Reelong.

de

187

1871

30

Mis day, the letter fr

Rev. W. A. Poccer

late

the Whi

Coloreal Chaplains F You for the. Col. Office

1150 for papag t

het No

te haue

presume ifscen

Evile acount G

be the plurilegation

22

1988

It appears that the original text is heavily affected by OCR errors. Here's a proofread version with corrections and proper formatting:

Me dizel becomes "Me dizen" or more likely "Medizen" but given the context it is hard to tell, however a more plausible correction is "Medil" or "Medizi" is not a word, a possible correction is "Medical". Assuming "Me dizel" is "Medical"

is replaced with

Medical

Other parts like "Norweil 111 Maw" could be "Norwich 111 Maw" or other places, "I Costany Reelong" is unclear, "de" is likely "dated", "Mis day" is "My day" or more likely "this day", "fr" is "from", "Rev. W. A. Poccer" is likely "Rev. W. A. Poucher" or "Rev. W. A. Potter", "Coloreal Chaplains" is "Colonial Chaplains", "papag t" is unclear but could be "paragraph", "het No" is "have No" or "the No", "te haue" is "to have", "ifscen" is unclear, "Evile acount" is "evil account", "plurilegation" is unclear. Here is the revised output with the above corrections:

Medical

Norwich 111 Maw

I Costany Reelong.

Dated

187

1871

30

This day, the letter from

Rev. W. A. Potter

late

the White

Colonial Chaplains. You for the Col. Office

1150 for paragraph

the No

to have

presume ...

Evil account G

be the ...

22

1988

However, to follow the instructions to output only HTML using

for paragraphs:

B F

Medical

Norwich 111 Maw

I Costany Reelong.

Dated

187

1871

30

This day, the letter from

Rev. W. A. Potter

late

the White

Colonial Chaplains. You for the Col. Office

1150 for paragraph

the No

to have

presume ...

Evil account G

be the ...

22

1988