177
sations in criticism
inform Mr. To and so
Son of
6. Mr. Prancis, in view, hind at comersa
suppat of his
7
of public Officers, obviously implying that he too might repeat damaging maller, did he chooser. I cannot of undertake to account for every
fevo f
idle ward I have
I am not
award
For there is
cow
spoken, but
That I
Ĉ tev
ead
anything to Mr Francis which might not be repeated, havever madvisable its repetition might be
great difference belirm saying
those things which, if promenlgated, may give offence, and betraying official secrets. The most casual
Ac
quaintances, when they lalu, do
not expect each other to
go
and
تو میمی
their expressed
opinion that he is
fen D. Mr Darcis strengelims his theory
by my general agreement with him.
On
tu p
did
agre
on
many questions the infamous coolie traffic
ave could
hardly differ. But sileuse does not always gives consent, and I had always rather listen to cobrame
for
one)
extreme
opinions than contradict them. In the
case) I differed from
Kwok a Sing
Mr Darcis in toto, and
so, though I
may
told him
have " ex profied" expressed
wander" at some particular action of
the Attorney General's, I darway,
did. But, wering
Mr Francis had
the
I
personal feeling
against
A
that Offiem
EX