172
recent Ordinance.
avo
to rendition to
of their guill."
·Macao had been thought of where
the accused had reserved to him
an
appeal
I first
to the Suprence Court.
Alnew
of
this case at
10 o'cloose last night and I slept
but little. At 8 Am. I found the
Maw
ww
had been sent off and wich
experince of
Chinese Justice
we know to what fate.
It was
This view
of the consequens)
of rendition which inspired the
words of Artide 91
of the Treaty
of 1808 that Criminals" subjects of
were to be
China"
as in
p not
given up
European Preation on reasmables
ground of suspicion but" on
proof
Naw this
m anv
has been
given
up" without proof of his guilt." It
seems to me
at present advised
that, First it is not proved that the
An an
is "a
subject of China):
Secondly- Mr. May belicon the board but he only
M an
Jaipo
Avas on
that there
Avas
such
A
care)
ant himi
again!
that he should)
have committed him.
that is to abide
there should or
A..
for
trial here-
trial in which
should not be "a
-proof of his guilt." Thirdly. The offences
en
w as
board a Trench Ship-
if at all French
on
Puritory and Bance not China reas
EX.