Z

3

249

Advice of the Legislative Cameil

"thereof, to amend Ordinance Ney of 1862, and to prande for the Summary

Chial of

cases in the Supreme Court?

I enclose a copy of the report made Endomet

cherem by the Attorney General:

2.

Ample

as

are the explanations

gium by Mr Panaefole, it is

for

me

needles

to detain Your Lordship

by any recapitulation of his remarks

upon the Ordinance.

3.

In reference, however, to the

Awelve Enclosures which

acen

ccampamp

are sent at

it, I am under the necefity of explaining that they the instance of Judge Ball who took exceptiar to the passing of the

Enclos No z to 14

Ordinance,

More

on the ground that the

ample Bill originally introduced

should have been proceeded with. I

Why this

fully

was not done is explained by the Attorney General.

Perhaps it might have been as well

to have increased,

as

wv as

at first

intended, the Common Law Jurisdiction:

of the Immmmary Cant to $1,000, and to have conferred upor

it

でもまへ..

Equitable

Jurisdiction to the extent of $2,000 as with the Cavity Courts in England, leaving it to Your Lordship to

decide whether Mr. Ball

entitled to

per

avatanı

the course

aw

was

J

addition of £500 to his Incane; but

погли

adopted has this

.

Share This Page