left to the Jury:
Was the Plaintiff imprisoned and charged with an
and bring so imprisoned
he
cr was
offence
the 18th
he not on the
April 1871, or when brought
a wit
before this Court upon, a of Habeas Compus and delivered
out of prison and set at large in respect of and from that offence?
Did the Defendant afterwards Knowingly and without the legal order or
process of this Court having
Court or of any
137
Jurisdiction in that behalf. the Plaintiff to be
cause
again same offence
imprisoned for the same
in respect of which he had been so delivered and set at loge.
It should be bome in
mind that the Prisoner had
on
the 1888 of April 1871 heen
discharged
on a writ of
Habeas
Corpus from his committal, to
await the order of the Governor under the Chinese Extradition Demand where he was charged
with Murder in French
Eurisdiction, and that as
not be surrendered for Trial I