4.
57
right to challenge:
The Discharge of the brisoner without previous commun
communication:
with Mr Russell does not meshaurity
imply any
Censure
mat,
necessarily upon him.
a Magistrate; but were it otherwise
I am of opinion that the request: Sam that his letter of the 3rd instant (in which he calls His Excellency to account for acceding to the Prisoner's
Communication
Petition without previous with him) should be published
in the Gazelle,
Gazette, is and which should
not have been made and which
should not be entertained!
the
In we further letter of the 100 instant Mr Russell requests in
219
language which implies a demand that all the Popers connected with the case should be transmitted to the Secretary of State.
Mr. Refall is not in my.
opimon entitled to make such a Iemand, but it is open to him to address a litter on the subject of his complaint to the Scaretary of State which His Excellency is bound to
transmit with such observations
ass
may think fit to a
fit to append. If Mr Russell should adopt this
he
Peute
j
this course
H is to svetlonay will probably transmit
Excellency for the information of the Secretary of State the Tapers in question, but
I think it would be inconvenient to