کو
in
the Colony) ever before 1866 complainch
that illegal gaming was
incapable of being kept under reasonable, limits, outych Suce, I think, in 1863, it became
iycepive and pras fromptly reduced.
ka nota
I have accertained that both in the Straits Sittlenments and in the Mauritius where the Chinese and Malay dements are as
as predominant- as in this Colony, the ordinary Laws wit sufficient to keep down Gaming.
ANC
same is Jam told the case
in all our vast Indian and Chonisl.
hopesions except in Hongkong. It seems therefore difficult to believe that Gaming
Gaming was beyond due
control here seeing that scarcely
من اليومية
but Sapien
330
any attempt by Legislation has bein made to effect that object.
3.
It is time that a short Adinanc
Nr. 14 8f 1944 was hoped and that by
fraped No 7 of 1866 the houscholder, is madi
liable for any breach of N° 14.83 1844 by his tenant but no other effort has been made since 1843 here by Legislation to control bamthing
expcept indeed A 9 of 1867 which has been so pate
as to authorize Gaming to an cytut unparalleled
me of
relatively to population.
A
4. In Rugland, however, since 1943
body of severe laws and fin michments
Irme
opposed, to the usual spirit of English Jurisprudence has been buil