I don't think this ordinance would do, but it is unnecessary to enter at lengths into the question, as Lord I has already determined that the questions shall wait until the governs returns to the colory, the Chief Justice its
For much of an enthusiast & partisan to be trusted with the powers conferred by the proposed ordinance, the powers themselves are too
ther the propand possible pomallies too sevene.
Great -
3/3/11
I would not
in expressing
diatribes.
must be a
other
-до
do
far opinion
ao
Ser Jr. Rogues purposes
M
1. J. Smales'
but I have
From what I have heard, he
foolish
Kurwn judges
land occasionally
in England
8 police magistrates frequently make very foolish remarks for the Bench
enactments which they happere to dislike,
and of
evicese
artica
by Goot of their remarks
J
Jame
is
ever
taber
The position
the [. J. of Hongkong" is not exactly the
as
that of judge I should contruit unyself
my
whicht I think regret
C. J. Imales.
neupay
to make
the subj
subject
ordinance
in England, but
writte
saying ther the language
I the urt
any
it
intimation to him
As
I should express
but merel sary
to make.
about it, not propere present practiv R. Macdonnell
while subject.
L
LA G
his draft oprivire
that I dr
any change
intel
who will
ein
the
と
conside
Le
the retin
K March 3/71
128
1147
The off: Adm 9. the Gort of
PRINTED pels
JH, 6. 379 of 18+ 71.
Autred
Hongkong N296
WNYLTE
N! Herbert 6 S&FROUTER
301
7 Marchion.
I have to actarwledge the recipt of your despatch h! 128 Calls the 10th See?? seltsing
letter coritten by the Chief Justice of Honghong, together
wit
ber
Mcinorandum
the cettorney general
m
by
subject of fisk grumbling
Licenses.
I
regret the language used by the Chief
Instice, but I do not think
it
necessary
to make
any
intimation to bring on stu
Subyet,
Make
nor do I propose to
any & hange
in this present
& Chongkong
practies, until the return of Sir R. have Donnell, to Wellishing
who will consider the johole
sambling
question of the issue of these
bienwar
A
K