in which on this occasion the

Emigration officer at Hongkong performed his duties.

Upon dealing with the question I submit that as regards the absence of a surgeon the Emigration Agent has vindicated himself;

but that the conclusions pronounced in that respect are the consequences of his omission to explain the facts;

and that in regard to light and ventilation at hatchways my calculations are erroneous. Due to no fault on my part.

19.

450

I see no reason to modify the opinions expressed in the report of 20 March last.

I have the honour to be,

Your Obedient

Humble servant,

[...]

However, to follow the exact output format as requested (HTML using

for paragraphs), here is the revised response:

in which on this occasion the

Emigration officer at Hongkong performed his duties.

Upon dealing with the question I submit that as regards the absence of a surgeon the Emigration Agent has vindicated himself;

but that the conclusions pronounced in that respect are the consequences of his omission to explain the facts;

and that in regard to light and ventilation at hatchways my calculations are erroneous. Due to no fault on my part.

19.

450

I see no reason to modify the opinions expressed in the report of 20 March last.

I have the honour to be,

Your Obedient

Humble servant,

Udoch

Share This Page