Duplicates N=127 to 138 inclusive
Circular of — 24th August, 1869.
26th
Circular of
I have the honor to be,
My Lord,
Your Lordship's most obedient,
humble Servant,
R. J. U. (likely "R. J. Warren" or similar, but corrected to fit known historical figures) is not directly correctable, assuming it is "R. MacGowan" or a similar name, but "Razis Jean" seems incorrect; a plausible correction could be "R. J. Morrison" or another historical figure, but without more context, it's hard to be certain. However, sticking strictly to the rules, it should be left as is or marked with "..." if clearly incorrect. Thus, it's left as is: Razis Jean
We
Seaners Governor.
Mardormell
Mun Cox
on the [3.10] 17
A correct acknowledg
Mo 8 dan to
The mails sent.
Paul Click to see
& then fully.
24
this Defel
Voted
San7
Pully
$820.
305 thg hồng
"Parl? Clerk
RECEN
2JAN 1870
487
My Lord,
Government House, Hong Kong, 8th November, 1867
I have the honor to acknowledge.
#
the receipt of Your Lordship's despatch
marked "Parliamentary" of the 7th September last, and, as requested by Your Lordship. I have to acquaint you in reply that the
The Right Honorable,
Carl Gramille, R. G.
Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State,
CC
Given the original text and following the instructions to output in HTML using `` for paragraphs, the above response is provided. Some names and terms, like "Razis Jean", "Seaners Governor", "Mardormell", "Mun Cox", "San7", "Pully", "thg hồng", are left as is due to the lack of clear context or the inability to confidently correct them without potentially altering the original meaning or content. "Carl Gramille" could potentially be a misrecognition of a historical figure's name, possibly "Granville". However, without clear evidence or context, it's corrected to fit the closest plausible historical figure or left as is. In this case, it's left as is.