49
want of
was
aw
windsails and code of signals
ersight. I was reporting on
as matter which had happened some
manche previously and was not in a position to afert positivity
whether these stores were
аг
to
on board?
* With respect to the Manning a crew, there is no law to determine what
mumber of Officers
or men
any ships
as
and nove to decide
may carry, to who out of England shall posses certificates of competency. We have a local law as to placing Officers Ships Register or Articles but nove to take them out of there ships if not in possession of such certificates.
In Hongkong
I am
20
accustomed
to ve
Qłamew
of all
all races
that wih
because
agree
all respect 2 carmet
maw
is a Sonch sea Islander he
muist of necipity
seaman!
be
aw
inefficient
6. My report states that the provisions
were
on board) inspected by myself the ship at the time of inspection. As it is stated that the
ifame of
provisions
The
AASTO
day after
reduced
by
The Master
the Ship sailed it must
be presumed that they and-changed!
wee
landed)
-changed subsequent to inspection
and the full quantity not taken
on board.
I was in
error
to make use)
of the
words" it is impossible that the Officer
Upon reviewing the provided text and applying the given rules for OCR proofreading, here is the corrected version in HTML format as requested:49
want of
was
aw
windsails and code of signals
ersight. I was reporting on
as matter which had happened some
manche previously and was not in a position to assert positively
whether these stores were
on board?
* With respect to the Manning of a crew, there is no law to determine what
number of Officers
or men
any ship
may carry, nor who out of England shall possess certificates of competency. We have a local law as to placing Officers on Ships' Register or Articles but none to take them out of their ships if not in possession of such certificates.
In Hongkong
I am
20
accustomed
to call
men
of all
races
that will
because
agree
in all respects
are
a South sea Islander he
must of necessity
be
a
seaman!
an
inefficient
6. My report states that the provisions
were
on board) inspected by myself at the time of inspection. As it is stated that the
quantity of
provisions
was
reduced
by
The Master
the day after
the Ship sailed it must
be presumed that they were changed!
or landed
changed subsequent to inspection
and the full quantity not taken
on board.
I was in
error
to make use
of the
words "it is impossible that the Officer