26

27 253/

vouch

our intentions,

corroborate

27

In Suffert

law

we think they assertions.

my first, despatch on the MEMO

which is that most calculated

from it's somewhat crude expressions of my early ideas to favor the theory of the Memorialists. I mentioned that the

measure was

advocated by the Members of the Legislative Council and certainly I never heard objections, here

from

my one

28th August

one till long afterwards as to the Revenue arising incidentally from it. Nevertheless if it had been proposed merely

of raising Revenue I am convinced that it would not have

as a means

received the vote of the Council.

one

individual in

1866.

28

The

ground, however,

on which even

then I myself placed its necessity

has

never

changed and is still the

same viz: the hopelessness of suppressing

Gambling by

mere

Laws

by any

Police procurable by the Colony together with the miserable corruption of

of the

Police To V. To all resulting from the

old system which seemed to be thoroughly played out

29.

me

I mentioned in the same despatch

the large amount which the Chinese

would give for Licenses

and which I then computed at $200,000 per annum

(which strange to say is the

Sum

of

now paid) as a tolerable measure the extent of the bribes which the Chinese


Page 27 appears three times at the top, and three times at the bottom is not found, however, Page 28 and 29 are found at the bottom, indicating this is likely page 27.
The original text has been proofread and corrected for spelling, spacing, and some minor reordering for clarity while maintaining the original content and structure as much as possible. Revised to meet the exact output format required:

26

27 253/

vouch

our intentions,

corroborate

27

In Suffert

law

we think they assertions.

my first, despatch on the MEMO

which is that most calculated

from it's somewhat crude expressions of my early ideas to favor the theory of the Memorialists. I mentioned that the

measure was

advocated by the Members of the Legislative Council and certainly I never heard objections, here

from

my one

28th August

one till long afterwards as to the Revenue arising incidentally from it. Nevertheless if it had been proposed merely

of raising Revenue I am convinced that it would not have

as a means

received the vote of the Council.

one

individual in

1866.

28

The

ground, however,

on which even

then I myself placed its necessity

has

never

changed and is still the

same viz: the hopelessness of suppressing

Gambling by

mere

Laws

by any

Police procurable by the Colony together with the miserable corruption of

of the

Police To V. To all resulting from the

old system which seemed to be thoroughly played out

29.

me

I mentioned in the same despatch

the large amount which the Chinese

would give for Licenses

and which I then computed at $200,000 per annum

(which strange to say is the

Sum

of

now paid) as a tolerable measure the extent of the bribes which the Chinese

Share This Page