In 636713
Copy
Houghong.
Interpretation of Terms Ordinance, No. 1 of 1867
Opinion of the Honourable J. Pattle, Attorney General
Probably Mr. Ball when he argued to wait for his return a favourable opportunity (as per Dispatch) meant that some other additions might be thought of, which might be inserted at the same time.
I agree with him that there was no immediate necessity for the passing of the proposed amendment Act, for practically we have no local rules of Court. Such obsolete practice as existed was extended by Ordinance No. 5 of 1826, the Rules of Hilary Term 1833 to the Supreme Court. By Section 1974 of...
Here is the revised output in HTML format, following the instructions:In 636713
Copy
Hongkong.
Interpretation of Terms Ordinance, No. 1 of 1867
Opinion of the Honourable J. Pattle, Attorney General
Probably Mr. Ball when he argued to wait for his return a favourable opportunity (as per Dispatch) meant that some other additions might be thought of, which might be inserted at the same time.
I agree with him that there was no immediate necessity for the passing of the proposed amendment Act, for practically we have no local rules of Court. Such obsolete practice as existed was extended by Ordinance No. 5 of 1826, the Rules of Hilary Term 1833 to the Supreme Court. By Section 1974 of...