This application
Nor can
I admit
B
If constructor which,
but at he at first
Sought
I put upon
Les 344 of the Ordinance
See E4
My 91882 which appears
No 7
&
Ike
to have been
correctly interpreted
by It. Dennysete
A
With the 18 March
letter of
It could
not have been intended (& this is shown
In the preamble) &
unable to which Patent
at
the
117
time when
any time
wanted to be
absent to call up
812
Me summary Judge!
sit for him; & get
is what I
In fact practically did.
Sam
glad to gather from your despatch
(par 9)
that Mr
Pannechten's designation
of the Office of Acting Judges of the Supreme Court has been
Con A
Page 120
Page 121