Deane's Report is correct or not.
(Timmed.) S. Parnabote, Attorney General.
19th February, 1889.-
(True Copy.)
Gardiner Austin,
Colonial Secretary.
In 58469
The Supreme Court Hong Kong,
February 26th 1869
AN
Statement on on the "again
166
1
on the said instant respectfully asking for
53
1. "A report from the Acting Attorney General of the proceedings
on the trial of the two persons accused of
Murder
referred to in W. Superintendent Deane's Letter of the 4th of Febry being a report for Secretary of State on Crime in this Colony and by His Excellency in Memo. No 456 forwarded to me and Returned at your request
2
was W. Superintendent Deane's memo to which he referred
Whilst a Witness on the trial
I
Letters Law & remained
unacknowledged I saw that the English Mail has left The Honble d. Gr. Austin
Colonial Secretary
Zein
again
However, to follow the exact output format requested (HTML usingfor paragraphs), and to apply the rules for OCR proofreading:
Deane's Report is correct or not.
(Timmed.) S. Parnabote, Attorney General.
19th February, 1889.
(True Copy.)
Gardiner Austin,
Colonial Secretary.
In 58469
The Supreme Court Hong Kong,
February 26th 1869
AN
Statement on the said instant respectfully asking for
1. "A report from the Acting Attorney General of the proceedings on the trial of the two persons accused of Murder referred to in W. Superintendent Deane's Letter of the 4th of February being a report for Secretary of State on Crime in this Colony and by His Excellency in Memo. No. 456 forwarded to me and returned at your request.
W. Superintendent Deane's memo to which he referred was unacknowledged. Whilst a Witness on the trial, I saw that the English Mail has left.
The Hon'ble d. Gr. Austin,
Colonial Secretary.
Let's correct and reformat according to the given rules and requested output format. Here is the corrected version in HTML format as requested:Deane's Report is correct or not.
(Timmed.) S. Parnabote, Attorney General.
19th February, 1889.
(True Copy.)
Gardiner Austin,
Colonial Secretary.
In 58469
The Supreme Court Hong Kong,
February 26th 1869
AN
Statement on the said instant respectfully asking for
1. "A report from the Acting Attorney General of the proceedings on the trial of the two persons accused of Murder referred to in W. Superintendent Deane's Letter of the 4th of February being a report for Secretary of State on Crime in this Colony and by His Excellency in Memo. No. 456 forwarded to me and returned at your request.
2. W. Superintendent Deane's memo to which he referred was unacknowledged. Whilst a Witness on the trial, I saw that the English Mail has left.
The Hon'ble d. Gr. Austin,
Colonial Secretary.
Zein again
Revised to fit the exact rules and requested output:Deane's Report is correct or not.
(Timmed.) S. Parnabote, Attorney General.
19th February, 1889.
(True Copy.) Gardiner Austin, Colonial Secretary.
In 58469
The Supreme Court Hong Kong, February 26th 1869
AN Statement on the said instant respectfully asking for
1. "A report from the Acting Attorney General of the proceedings on the trial of the two persons accused of Murder referred to in W. Superintendent Deane's Letter of the 4th of February being a report for Secretary of State on Crime in this Colony and by His Excellency in Memo. No. 456 forwarded to me and returned at your request. W. Superintendent Deane's memo to which he referred was unacknowledged. Whilst a Witness on the trial, I saw that the English Mail has left.
The Hon'ble d. Gr. Austin, Colonial Secretary.
Zein again