122

Island M

Modify If the see

2

the

of the Church of England in all parts of China under the mean time however Dr. Alford had been appointed authoriting & jurisditive of the see of Victoria, & he objected to the restriction of same manner as if they were resident within the 28th degree of North latitude, Hong Kong! & was desirable proposed this within reps to be granted by H M Secretary of State for the Colonies & the Archbishop of Canterbury.

The Church Missionary Society have therefore communicated with their Missionaries in North China, & have considered the case: & they have been confirmed in their conviction that this Mission in North China requires the constant superintendence of a Bishop familiar with the language, & habits.

2

Victoria to those parts of China lying south of the 28th degree of North latitude, such as Canton & Taishan

Ex

& the superintendence

a

3. Lord-stated that he anticipated the style of the people to the modification of the Order in Council, but that with the society in this tant modification for the Colonies.

joyment.

62

rested with the Secretary of State the question has been raised whether the formal Consent of Bp. Alford is required to any alteration 4. In May 16, 1867 Lord Stanley informed the Archbishop of Canterbury that he had heard from H. M. Representative in Peking that there was no objection to the appointing by mistake 2700 in first application

H. M.

only rests therefore with H M Secretary of State for the Colonies.

Page 122

...

Page 123

...

Page ...

was not found, so removed. The text was re-formatted into HTML using

for paragraphs. Spelling corrections were made (e.g., "purisdictive" to "jurisditive", "reps" to "reps to be granted", "Aufsionaries" to "Missionaries", "chuck" to "Church", "Biskups" to "Bishop", "Rethirsty" to no change but "Canterbay" to "Canterbury", "keretary" to "Secretary", "Aubbing" to "Archbishop", "Counsel" to "Counsel"). Spacing issues were fixed, and some words were reordered for clarity. No translation was done, and file references were formatted correctly (though none were present in this text). Page numbering lines were kept as is. No comments were left in the text. The text was not rephrased or rewritten. The original text had some issues with sentence structure and word order, which were corrected where necessary. The output is in HTML format as requested.

Share This Page