3 despatches 10442. 9818. < 9555. & for his information.
L
7. Rozen
((14/11
fer reports Theat
Lee also 11410 from B. All things considered I think
Mr. Holland
I un...
Snow.my
my
I read a
way of this
L. Si M. Mar
donnel mi
answer
12457 A Kory
At
509
Sir 7. Rogen.
2
The papers in this matter have been laid
Trade who have reported this
The Proclamation does not infringe
Dr. By
By trade
Malo
Tien-him- (her
(her alter
11410).
I have
The Law Offices have always been consulted
probably taken the same view though Lade
Stanley has not sent a
copy of their opinion.
lsen of 11410 Bif trade & within 7.0 letter
12487 should be sent to tie 1 llardonnelle
at
suggested SW Cap-
thin
I think it may fairly be collected from 7.0 letter that Sir R Macdonnell felt, that Sir R Macdonnell should have had full information of the bearing of the Proclamation furnished him
A
hed to
and the latter part of the letter gives
somewhat lame excuse for the omission. He said that Sir R Macdonnell's letter of
Jun
10 acknowledged receipt of Robertan's letter of ... 6th make no
information.
request for further
But it is quite clear from the terms of the