سشو
71
in my despatch above alluded to,
300
were at variance, whilst Captain 7556 /by Gallen
his letter to the Under
Suoritary of State for the Colonies, dalid
30
ch
36th January, 188, inclosed in thou
13th-
Grace's despatch to me M:33 of 13
Pelnuary
last
Dapo-
ik
Sir John Pakkington
" is therefore of opinion that, unless
"the local Laws of thoughing require
"Police and
"
br
Lighting Wates to be paid
" for buildings hired by Government for
"Military purposes sti's claim
to
xemption from such Rates should
tance?"
"be allowed in the present mistane
کچھ
I cannot su
)
that the XIV clanse
of the enclosed Ordinance exempt
Buildings hired) by the Military from
Legal opinions
bring assessed and as differ, though the weight appears
in favor of the laxation, I should like to have the
case)
for a definite decision.
1122/68
b.
an enbmitted.
agan
In the event of the decision
being adverse which I do not anticipate. Un Majesty's Government will have to consider whether they
are not
reality simposing.
on.
the
Colony, a contributions of something like $ 105,000 instead of the & 90,000
originally
contemplated. It certainly amonats to
The
Dawe
of
ly a
thing wheelin the income
whether the Colary be diminished) $10,000
direct payment made to Her Majesty's Preasury or by lapping
$10,000
off the