I think ther with le
menuti by your
& me it i
и дин
A
the It affean
Galler
eference in the 8.0.
Sir F. Rogers
A
Effechend that
the new of the
11/20
اند
W. Holland
in hy
the men
19
correct, that the French merchant sefped was wit bycraft from the tourstand pusscdition of the port
in which she was
Lying 1
No doubt the law of France differs from
our
this respect, for it estableicher a distinction between
mere interior descipline of the refeed & ever Crimes committed 5
1. aut of
one
of the crew against are the
of the crew, when the peace of the fort is not
2
disturbed, & crimes commillet on
hoand then
Manish penus net forming part of the crew,
ренин
I apenas no formy past the crew, or
✔
thome
committed I the weww amayst the avalon, if the
peace of ther port is dis herbed-
In the front
case the breach county decline to
Exercise jurisdiction, thand that the local auth should not riterfere unless it, and in demanded I am
are not aware that this doctrine is held ) any
ther nation.
-
I
The other important prection raised par papers relates to the position of Manels & whether thes powven shared with extended. This question under the canideration of the 7.0 + Bound of
To 7.0. with a request that Low Standy will reform by what armour should be whorel Wsi R Macdonnell.-
inticipate
But Mr Holland,
11/174 27/11
him with he found extrong comel 68.0. +Bq7. as hopond
41. M 301 #