637
2:33
کرتی
#1
Jounal Chane: p. 110 that notice by
ફર્મે
Campany
to take land under their
compulsory powers, and the subsequent
fixing of the pen chase and comprensation
money by arbitration, tagulas
A
to geshor
carstitute
contract for sale and purchase),
which the Court will enforce at the
#
sistance of the vendor. We says: " the
"Master of the Rolls had fist the maller
"
An
The
do
right grounds
in the Reguito
"Canal Company & War; after notice
and the price fixed, the relation
given
vendor and
of the parties, as vendos
was
A.A
case)
16.
fully constituted)
as
purchaser,
in the
of a formal and regular agreement." Perhaps havwer, of all the
which I have cited, the me
»
with which I shall
list
may
plete the
be recognized by this
Excellamy
as the most
er
andusive,
namely:- The Misti-politan Railway
ت
Company v. Woodhouse decided) in 1865- by Stuart V.C. who at the mistance of a railway
paited
ANV
injunction,
pany
Con
to restrain a landowner from selling property comprised in a notice to treat for the purchase there of served) uper him by the Company
Itirait V.C.
༧༩་1༧ .
#
"I think the
"auctiority quoted by Mr. Dave (Haynes
I D.
"1
"v. Magnes 30 Law Jour:
ence
"decisive of the question. Vice Chancellor
"Kindersley, in the cave referred
referred to,
"ditiough he makes use
of
Jane)