20

34

اوار

of an importation of 80,000 Chests not

more

from

than bosc, three fourths of which are Marus, escape paying the regular tariff and other duties of the Chinese Government, to that the real loss sustained by the bhinese

Government of mere Tariff duty at 30 Jails

per

chest instead of being

Million

ome

of

27.

Juels is considerably lep than 200,000 Juels. As however the Chinese Government and it's official employes have hitherto shewn protection of it's Revenue, except at the Treaty Ports, the utmost apathy alternating with occasional rapacity

and extortion

the part of its minor sevents, it seems to

mme

that puch a Govemment should

congratulate itself on only loving a sum for lep than that which it would have been

obliged to exper a on

maintaining

amu

adequate preventive service.

28.

that however is a point unconnected

with the mam

question

now

submitted to

Your Grace. which question involves no life than the legality of the whole system devised by the Vice May and approved by

Her Majesty's Minister in China, and Inally the propriety of the course

pursued

at

by the latter and ober Majestijo bonsul ut banton towards this Government

ment in

studiously keeping from my knowledge

moment to the

matters of essential interests of this leatony.

29.

The first question

--

generat

can be better CH

resolved by English Lawyers than by any

ome

here,

as mo

bhinese

experience or learning

Share This Page