most erroneousty termed "tivo most unjust and unfounded attacks by myself
the character
of
2.Mr Clark,” in Paragraph 15 of my N°48 of 23rd April. With reference to the first I solicit His Exatloncy's perusal of a Note in my possession from the Head Mucantite Firm in Hong Kong but which bring morked "Private" I am
This Note will prove that my
neither
a
am unable to attach to this letter.
Statement was unjust and I
nfounded.
mor
respectfectly submit that before being told
that it was so I should have been called
upon for my proofs. With reference to the Second case I depend upon
a statement
made by Mr. Clark to myself when returning some months back from the Mountain Lodge
-
Works . I may add that
friendly way discussing
AVILI ALICARI
in
Q
our Antecedents
and the names of Engineers under whom
AAN
had respectively served in England.
My only object in
in
bringing these circumstances
to the Notice of His Excellency was to Showr that I was not the first person who had
working
experienced, difficulty in work-
&
ann
505
with at Clart.
well aware that Mr. Clarth has
represented "That I have spread injurious
Codes
"reports with reference to him" which is not the and cannot be proved. He has also stated " that I am incompetent for my duties", ands
that my Department is inefficiently organized
Branch " Although I cannot for
in
every
one moment admit Mr. Clark
مره
3 my Junion to be a judge of my professional qualifications am nevertheless most willing to submit
my
actions in the Surveyor-Genual's Depart... ment to the opinion of any qualified and impartial person . And while on this subject I will refer this Excellency to this liver most important works which I have had under my charge during my
administration.
کرده
the
Department. The first is "The Royal Mint" the
少
Second. "The Gonfulum Water Works " non in
of constructions . The Mint Buildings
CQARA DE
erecteds at ar
Cost of $ 115,000 are built on
reclaimed Ground 1000 feet: Seawards from High water Mark. Notwithstanding the