2
101
3
by the action taken by Consular-
diplomatic Authorities in China, I
an aph
apparent
think it right to notice an misapprehension of Your Grace as to my having taken up publicly the wrong
TE
I done to the Chinese owner of the "Prince Albert Steamer, or having tatten any Public steps" whatever in the matter.
12.
I endeavoured in
in my Despatches
to Your Grace and to Her Majesty's
views
Minister at Peking to express my and opinions clearly and without reserve; but beyond receiving from the owner of "the "Prince Albert" and his Counsel the
various depositions and explanations which they wished transmitted, and
which in
any
case
it would be equally
Vide Concloone 3
my duty in future to forward to Your Grace's Department, I gave no publicity
any part of the proceedings. 3. Muck. a. bheong,
to
owner
#1
of the Prince
Albert, and likewise his bounsel, but,
above all, Sir Rutherford Alcock himself
do you by his published letter of the 7th August
in Gov to, bey of State Ne. 360.5 Sept 1867.
in a local newspaper, referring to me
personally, conferred, doubtles, considuable
jom
the
one could
publicity
question. No read the latter document without becoming aware of the difference of opinion existing
between
us, a
difference which still exists
as to the abstract
justice and actual
legality of the punishment inflicted
on
Kwok. a. bheong by the Chinese Authorities.
4. The
information
now transmitted