for information, I think that it world be better to tell them that we have done so, as otherwise they may say that we gaves them to answer at all
But Town that it appears. me open to grave doubt whether it is as
for referring to the Granor
Leopar
Caso
The Chamber of Commerce,
as I understand
as
the Judge. or has done and
them do not even allego that they fiven a wrong jridgment, injustion as regards the distribution of
the Bankrupts property-
Qu
alleged,
Even
if they had ds, I do not know that the Executive reument has any power of interference with the Bench. But what
Itiey
do
say to merely that they are
displeased with some of
which the Judge
the remarks
And a
ngular ing Communication
presions an
is to be at Im Colony
made in giving hispidgment. Is it possible that this can be a case.
ttre Executive Government to call a
a prop
to a comnt? If not, it seems to me a serini's question whether the proper ansva to the Chamber of Commerce
that this
eugest
of interference,-
is hot mo
with Mr.
I cathies along to upl
Ellist. Cond
hat it appears to try.
any
not be
which admits
the
7 Leptr
incopes State the Excentur fort Ruda assum.
the function of criting, refahrnier and sides
Hongkong
8702
Sale 26 Sept. 16.
Malcolm Ross days Sin
MINUTE /
SEPA
V. Au 18
MAddorion 20
Debre Bustingham 2.3
End
131
Lam directed lefther
Auke of Buckingham of hands
the rempt backnowlage
of gone letter
of the
- mentiing up.
Quiet
然
Judgment ditioond te thing
Justin Fresh in the Count
Bankruptig at Hongkong
on the case
4/0
Lyall
still
that
& Suggesting
the fort should sxpress thin disapproval of some
of his
Unverks
Nat
Care
In up Lambs info
State to
you for heformention ofthe direta, offto Mancheala Chamber
of Conomerce that it