14
10.
In reference havwer, to his refusal to obey a lawful orden as to refunding a balance due from hin, and aganist which order, he might of course, if he fell aggrieved, have subser quently appealed, and also as to the insubordinate and insulting behavior of which he
I am supelf
was
guilty,
of opinion that his explanations
are)
wholly unsatisfactory, and carsequently
I now
carry
out the intention signified
case, laying the
to him of, in that case,
whole matter before my
Commeil.
16.
If this were the first
d.
the third instance of Mr.
Davies obstructivenes, I might have
cartented, myself.
as
о
former
د
7
4.
174
15.
cccasions by drawing up a sharp and
severe tent on his condud and giving
to the future-
hin
a warning
A0
Clearly, howwer, that sort of Prutiner fulmm" cannot be resorted to pr pelusz ally without rendering the Executive at last ridiculous. I also feel that Mr Davies in his defence travels most
uitably out of the records, in
MANO am
his allusions to Mr. Allen,
and like- wise that whilst his system of fors warding "declarations" of curtain facts by himself is
Think
A
AM/
unusual and I
espuchensible
with them, which adds
way
of dealing
credit to
Mo
them; the declarations which he
Conto
encloves of the Sentry and Mr Porte