嘁
116
same character
as
that on previons
occasions, rendued Mr Davies at once)
liable to
any punishment in the paver
Mwacheles, I am swe that
of the Geminor
and Comeil to inflict.
8.
P-express the
opinion
well
as
my own,
my Comcil as when I say that
despite all Mr Davies' previous mis-
• ૮ ૧
-conduct, if he had by his defence I gium the last reasonable
hoping that he
MOVI
ground) for
prepared to give and obstructive
up his litigious and
or that he could really acknowledge his errors, have been
LAS PA
see and
career
frankly,
there would
disposition to offord
him a "locus penitentic and disperse
extreme
with the necefsity of resorting to antieme
Evelour. Mey.
MLASMALG
I now enclose his defence and
Your Grace
Caw
judge, if he therely
improves his case. It is true that he adinite disrespect to his superior, but
in such
a
Avay
AR
to
justify it, and This by what I regard in substance
as a iny intenchful colouring of facts. As to his refusal to abide by the
decision of the Audit Cluse, and inference from his
Mo
intention or
aow
che
accounts he evinces
wish to withdraw from
the position, which from the first he chon to assume, whilst he evinces much malice in the insinuations which he
contrives to introduce against taste of the Mint on matters wholly,
the