407
raved ouw the remains of having the greater part of the wall, I confess that I think Mr Wilson is sanguine in considering "the rubble foundation" and "two footing" injured.
9.
corro es whan the main expense should fall they must be greatly disheartened, and I question if they will not throw to be still of the $17,000 expended - already by Government since 1864 on the at least $14,000 may be regarded as utterly lost, whilst on the other hand the $23,864, for which Mr Wilson reports the Government still liable in the event of the work probably exceed resumed would if the new wall is to be being $30,000, if the string chained
10.
as be now recommends: As for the tenants up their lots somer than encounter further risks. To test them I have desired a Circular to be sent to them stating that, if they do not forthwith commune The filling and reclamation of their lots a both works behind the Sea Wall, should progress simultaneously, proceedings will be taken against them for recovery of the original heavy rental which they agreed to pay, but of 9/8th of which they were provisionally relieved of for certain period as explained in