117
correctness of the facts connected
with the
voyage
of the Prince
Albert, as detailed by the Master
of that vessel, whose
story
has
never
been questioned, much less confuted, the confiscation of the vessel was illegal. Conce Gowe Exxcellency will percive, that the question is not so much what fine should be
levied on the owner
27
Albert as what com
of the
Prince
what compensation
should be paid to him for
illegal and oppressive
act
dr.
by
I therefore hope that the
owner, so far from yielding to
" the Consular intervention in his
faver
"
as Consul Robertson somewhat
quaintly designates the imposition
of an additional wrong
will resist
a demand which, in the opinion of
the Attorney General is the illegal result of proceedings, which
17
have authority for stating from the first adopted contrary to the opinion and wishes Inspector of Customs at Counton.
12.
adds
It is
arong
of
The
a demand which
c
to wrong, although it may be light when compared with the loss and injury already
inflicted.
The enclosed statement Exchesari 23 of Mwok-a-Cheong shows that
Enclosure. 3.