127
In the latter of these two questions it is not stated what form is referred to, whether form of appointment, or form of indictment. If the former, I have shown it to be in order, and there should therefore be no necessity for varying it. If the form of information or indictment be errant, I have already said that I believe it to have been rightly drawn by Mr Ball; but supposing the Court amend the form even is done not before être Court?
to Section 241 of Ordinance 3 of 1865 will I think be VII.
Is it possible by any means to act on Sections 4 and 5 of 3 of 1865 as to prefer a valid information by any person and in any way other than by the Attorney General himself?
Answer. Clearly Section 41 is expressly designed to give such power, and gives it.
(signed) W.P. An.
admitted conclusive on this subject; it embraces both form and substance.
(signed) W.P.M.
Is there not a legal presumption contra opeliatorum?
(signed) W.P.M.
MUA 1 1-7 420
$44 and 5 of 3 of 1865
Army
It widers