subject to the deductions proposed by the Commission case the force should fall short of the complement fixed by them. The conditions of that deduction should be so stated as to prevent any deficiency in one part being made up by an excess in another.
In the rest of the years, viz., 1866, 1867, 1868,
1. Provision is made for a deficiency in Native Soldiery which is made up by excess of European Artillery.
"The Ordinance effecting these objects should be perpetual, but it should be understood that it will be subject to revision at a stated period. I think that period should be 5 years rather than 10 - the number proposed by the Commission. When it is reviewed by the Home Government,
it should be made clear (what is intended to be done).
No deduction will be made for deficiency of European Infantry which is made up by excess of Artillery or vice versa.
£140,000, £150,000, £160,000
becomessubject to the deductions
proposed by the Com-
mission
case the
force should fall
short of
the complement fixed by them. The
conditions of
that
deduction
so stated
as
to
prevent of
two
In the rest
of years
viz.
1866
1867
1868
1.
for
a
deficiency
in
Native Soldiery which
is made up by
excess of European
Artillery.
"The Ordinance effecting
these objects should be perpetual, but
it should
be understood.
that it
will
be
subject to revision
at a stated period. I think that period.
should
be 5 years
rather than 10 - the
number proposed by the Commission. When it is reviewed by the Home Government,
it should be made clear (what is intended to be done).
No deduction will be made for deficiency of European Infantry which is made up by excess of Artillery or vice versa.
£140,000, £150,000, £160,000
Here is the proofread text in HTML format:subject to the deductions proposed by the Commission, the force should fall short of the complement fixed by them. The conditions of that deduction should be so stated as to prevent any deficiency in one part being made up by an excess in another part.
In the rest of the years, viz., 1866, 1867, 1868,
1. Provision is made for a deficiency in Native Soldiery which is made up by excess of European Artillery.
The Ordinance effecting these objects should be perpetual, but it should be understood that it will be subject to revision at a stated period. I think that period should be 5 years rather than 10 - the number proposed by the Commission. When it is reviewed by the Home Government, it should be made clear (what is intended to be done).
No deduction will be made for deficiency of European Infantry which is made up by excess of Artillery or vice versa.
£140,000, £150,000, £160,000