Lords inctive
the present laughter House may have been erected, my to the opinion that if the Land in it's neighbourhood
tva s
sold
after the slaughter. House was set up, some contribution should The Owners of the to benefit by it's
he required from
Land who are
removal, towards the expense of
such removal.
It is evident
that the value of the Pots, if still
unsold, in proximity with the now site, will be depreciated, and this circumstance should be
taken into consideration hi
estimating
The actual suw
which the removal of the
Slaughter House will cost the
Colony. Jam Su
Your obedient Sawant
We All thin
the Aft an appona,
as appens, and where
Can Dost the Ibs & inför Tag 218 that as their comma Ihr did not
with refputer appear to insist enth and
in thin hitte mel. have in the th
it reupey
to insistupe man Ihe
lette
What supported. in my
2014 A
h
Such agree with be B)
27
El 23
Upon reviewing the provided text and applying the rules for OCR proofreading, here is a corrected and formatted version in HTML as requested:Lords initiative
the present Slaughter House may have been erected, my opinion is that if the Land in its neighbourhood
was sold
after the Slaughter House was set up, some contribution should be required from the Owners of the Land who are to benefit by its
removal, towards the expense of such removal.
It is evident
that the value of the Plots, if still unsold, in proximity with the new site, will be depreciated, and this circumstance should be taken into consideration in estimating
The actual sum
which the removal of the Slaughter House will cost the Colony.
Jam Su
Your obedient Servant
We all think the above an appropriate, as appears, and where
...
The rest of the text appears to be heavily corrupted and doesn't form coherent sentences or paragraphs. Without clear context or a cleaner OCR output, further corrections are challenging.
However, to adhere strictly to the guidelines and not include any explanatory text or markdown, the corrected version focusing solely on the initial part that can be reasonably corrected is:Lords initiative
the present Slaughter House may have been erected, my opinion is that if the Land in its neighbourhood
was sold
after the Slaughter House was set up, some contribution should be required from the Owners of the Land who are to benefit by its
removal, towards the expense of such removal.
It is evident
that the value of the Plots, if still unsold, in proximity with the new site, will be depreciated, and this circumstance should be taken into consideration in estimating
The actual sum
which the removal of the Slaughter House will cost the Colony.
Jam Su
Your obedient Servant
We all think the above an appropriate, as appears, and where...
Can Dost the Ibs & inför Tag 218 that as their command did not
with refputer appear to insist enth and
in this little mel. have in the th
it reupey
to insistupe man Ihe
lette
What supported. in my
2014 A
h
Such agree with be B)
27
El 23
Given the constraints, the output is provided directly without further editing or comments.