CO129-116 - Sir MacDonnell - 1866 [11-12]

with regard to any future extension, biz- "That the Government-

have

ono

objection to

the reclamation of

Ground

sides of

on the north

Lots 90 and

21 to the extent shown

And tinted yellow on) accompanying plan"

but. I had not the remo-

leor Idea at the time

that the War Depart-

ment were in treaty for

the property

My instructions from

When

is

M. Pollard the Counsel

370

for the Estate, alluded

in no

way

to the War

Department as the

probable future purchasers

The first time

I heard that such was

the case was a few weeks

back, and since the

notice of resumption is of the passage adjoining Marine Lot- 21 was

served on the Tenants –

valuations can

My value

therefore be connected

in no

way

with the

Here is the corrected version in HTML format:

With regard to any future extension, "That the Government have no objection to the reclamation of grounds on the north sides of Lots 90 and 21 to the extent shown and tinted yellow on the accompanying plan" but. I had not the remotest idea at the time that the War Department were in treaty for the property.

My instructions from M. Pollard, the Counsel for the Estate, alluded in no way to the War Department as the probable future purchasers.

The first time I heard that such was the case was a few weeks back, and since the notice of resumption of the passage adjoining Marine Lot 21 was served on the tenants – valuations can my value therefore be connected in no way with the

However, to follow the exact instruction to output only HTML using

for paragraphs, the corrected response is:

With regard to any future extension, "That the Government have no objection to the reclamation of grounds on the north sides of Lots 90 and 21 to the extent shown and tinted yellow on the accompanying plan" but. I had not the remotest idea at the time that the War Department were in treaty for the property.

My instructions from M. Pollard, the Counsel for the Estate, alluded in no way to the War Department as the probable future purchasers. The first time I heard that such was the case was a few weeks back, and since the notice of resumption of the passage adjoining Marine Lot 21 was served on the tenants – valuations can my value therefore be connected in no way with the