15.
I therefore directed the final rehearing of the case on the 30% may-
and it ended as
fricoren
n
30th
might have been-
in still more clearly establishing. the guilt of the Prisoner on that-
point however I thought it advisable more complete satisfaction to In your obtain the encloud opinion of the Acting Attorney General whom I had
employed to watch the proceedings- and
| his opinion
guilt
was clear as to the mom's
and the "bona fide" charader of all the fuceedings lakin by the Chinese
Authorities.
16.
steps
I therefore directed the nice
defow to be laker for handing
Over
necefoamy
the Prisoner
No QA
2016
30 May...
1866
4 June 1886
NIJ
4. June 1866,
Ss 1920, 7?!
4 June 1866.
337
to the lemont at lanton
for delivery
to
requesting
the
the Civil power there-
tommand to satisfy himself thoroughly
of the good faith with which the guarantees
given by the Nice Roy
and this he has
M 22
5 June 1886.
17.
may
As profsibly
was carried ont
engaged
to do.
some erroneous statements
be tromsmitted by the prefs relative to
the above proceedings, although I think such
a
thing very unlikely, yet bearing in mind
the circumstances of the last Rendition Case,
I have thought it better to send the enclosed documents at once
you
without waiting for Consul Robertson's
as to the
gord faith
final Report in which the Bledge given by
the