same
taken in At som for
Chang
that
adeflect in the other hand
of the hindwaix de jour
The letter of the miniler of the 20 of the 1857 w. dudtlap pwhilit back the oath ofthe Execution formiter recept ehun parented by laws. But as the
hartier
alment uninual
I were dufundi to maker it
D.
Just
Hrunn it denues ceruideator
whither the axumpange Party Utum 2nd le mornin with a mind to auntain what
rathi (not being regard by by law)
the discentesined
Key 12. follows the fate of the nut.
Kus
MS. Gairdner
Will you
hi good enough
I consider the printed when in reference 4. Si P. Rogan's last suggestion. Is? hrefer
to dealing if I can see my way to it
with the matter as a
whol
ate mi
Ch 12 Sept- 166
:
5901 Hong Kong and Colonies General
386
Hvory Hory - Sot. Comp. 18copil 166
Cornwallers
Oaths taken by Governors or
5901
I have assumed
that the last Paragraphe
xon 3901 Hong Kong - of your Minute
Brem I seems the the can
on the whole
1. That the oath, d allyjeand are talen
to defend from.
a - The Itatutory fam he Protestants. pass.
6. Statutory from pe Roman Cath" pay.
form.
cas
meant to supersede
the others.
I am
afraid.
that I have misled
you by describing the
return laid before.
10 Parliament as
showing
< Short fom p. 15.17. the battis administered
por Protestant
d. Old Obsolete fim,
pp. 13. 14
(or duik)
2. obsilite from ser
R. Cath? p.19.
to Office holders and
"others in the different
"Colonies," whereas the
all then shwild be redir secotion was merely for Hamm
I
# two refund
18 Jil
حافة
Page 390Page 391