1
67
111
way for the loss of those surns.
It is. manifest that the Clerk of the Court did not display the same zeal
and activity with respect to the Police
and
Sighting Rate Warrants
as
he
did in the discharge of the ordinary
business of the Count
In a letter addressed by him to the
Acting Judge of the Comt dated the 13¢
May 1865 he writes:
0
I did not consider it necess
prepare Warrants
necessary
ter than they faster
required by the Bailiff."
lö
wvenes
He does not mit however to proint
out the fact of the Sists of Defantters
for
1864 not having been sent to the
bant tile 1865 and the inadequacy of