Adm
foreinenent only can say under what circumstances the advance was made
I would recommend that the question of his liability be again referred to the Attorney General of that Colony, where particular attention should be directed to the points now raised
I have not returned any answer to Mr. Kitto's letter of the 14 ultimo, a copy of which I forwarded on the 21 ultimo
I have the honour to be, Sir, your most Obedient Servant
W C Sargraunt
Entered 63-4985/15 Hong Kong 67
Copy to be sent to the Governor instructing him to submit further correspondence
To the Attorney General & Solicitor General
Roderic Rogers, E. Fulham, Mr. C. Palliser, 22nd Lord Cardwell, Mr Porter
Roughly upon second thoughts I don't think this bandying backwards and forwards is creditable to this office
30th April 1868
I am directed by Mr Secretary Cardwell to submit the accompanying papers for your consideration
I have taken the opinion of the Solicitor General and the Attorney General on whether the liability of Kitto to repay the sum advanced by the Government as Emigration expenses is valid
In the Conveyance to the Harbour Board some office land was included
File Reference: XCR(85)72 is not present, however 4/6177 is seen.
Page information is not detected in this text.
...