229
R
V
P
from this opinion, and
Contending
Military
that as regards Post "there would be an injustice ...
accepting ... from such a contribution.
C 4 in ...
Military plans as contaminating prosperous Communities to long as the Financial Amount falls short of the cost of the number of the Troops which they would require for their own purpose." proceed when dealing specifically with the case to observe that he supports "In Garrison there" will "always be within the limit of the amount considered indispensable for general National objects."
I entirely agree with Mr Ellis that some Military Post maintained for Imperial purposes may "fairly be asked to Contribute a moderate quota towards the expense of Troops which are indispensable to its internal security", but I have already explained (1) that in my opinion they are not indispensable for the security of Hongkong.