Valid loan must
then may be disapproved of (a firm) and his facility difficult
clearly referred
be regards the "not" Mr. Alexander
and why this
protested at 6. Mr. Fall kit in
helli of the 15 Oct: (draft
the Large
Then turned down
did not Manati
in evl: 221) "did not
was written, whereas in
we will
Emanate
it was" decided
Die original
was
wrong
right reading
original
must have
the
why
In dusty
apparent from the left then letti
add for I think Metall in night.
bind
b. you cite the following note G.W.W.
In Forth.
Alexander
in the
margin of
Wellin
"(Art)
the
but it
the word was
" original. Had it been it would "have conveyed
a
misstatement...
(C.16 Jmb2
The Hunter, opstate ought an
to be Grutled
with much an
After this "not" controversy.
How the correspondent then. But Mr Gott cs in em refect an A much A Nam as the receipt of his letter of 30 Oct: had all her to Duffon.
It appears that that letter was
not treating an
an attempt to
and
circumvent the authority by communicating dunt with this office this inthoud breach of regulations notens as follow.
"It is quite evident that in sending
The letters du Path an
quills of
a deliberate attempt to evade the
Rules of the Govt
We regret that
all such communications should
Page 7