Ц
437
but the tenor of the opinion shews that the advise
I concur in
word here written, but it every.
J
gave
those
should have appeared that I had previous given
a similar opinion which I did in a
which I did in a letter of the
100k
1༦
of
September 1862 addressed to the Superintendent
Police in a hurried business note (a copy of
which made from the original furnished by Mr. Quin I enclose) in that note I expressly cantioned him to make out the police accounts
in two parts; because the ordinary expences of the Police should be borne by
the
publie
the-
extraordinary expenses of taking care of the opium
understand that even
holders; and In
Mery
could not have been referred to, and this
correcting
learned Counsel assume that they are
ала
opinion of mine, which in fact
by anticipation in this respect as identical
with their own as the first part of their opinion
is with what they coneur in.
My reputation
ао а
injured at the Colonial Office
Lawyer has this been.
and I trust that
ications
this explanation will be forwarded for my justifica
there.
Should be borne by
the
opium
the
expenses
yet no attempt at apportioning
incurred has been made.
on
am
moh
aw are
of the emntents of the.
Deepath from the is Balloney the Acting Gounor
which
was submitted to the Law
Officers
but
I may
and that I
was not consulted
the Setter of the Superintendent of Police of the
2y de August, 1862.
I
would
further remark that them
questions raised are not likely ever
to reeur and
that Mr. Sherard ultimately become the
5 only